
After seeing W. I'm not sure if this movie is a faithful portrayal of Bush or a comedy or a satire; it's probably a combination of them. I get the impression that Stone started out as a surreal satire but changed his mind to make him more sympathetic. The trailer is misleading as he's not always the fool or easily manipulated by his Cabinet. Yes he says a lot of dumb things, but he stands by his convictions when he feels he's right. The story hinges on simplistic Freud as reckless young George tries to live up to his tightass Daddy's expectations and is always compared to his successful brother Jeb. Barbara the Dragon Lady offers no support so it's up to his faithful Laura who keeps him on the right path.
The casting is amazing at times as certain actors resemble their characters. Richard Dreyfuss can be Cheney's twin and Josh Brolin is uncanny as Bush. Elizabeth Banks' performance as his kind and supportive wife is a tribute to the real Laura Bush we see on TV.
Those who detest Bush will enjoy the comic elements, especially the use of songs to punctuate the procedings, while his supporters will like the scenes where he overcomes the wild ways of his youth and stands up against his father and his Cabinet. Maybe this is what Stone eventually wanted, to please everyone in the audience. However you feel about Bush, you will find something here to relate to in W.







