Above are the different versions available. I purchased the bottom one, a two disc set with an excellent documentary about the film's history. More on the other sets. Here's a good article about the film's making and revised restoration: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/movies/30kapl.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
I saw Blade Runner in the theater in '83. I liked it but didn't think it would go over with the Star Wars/E.T crowd. It proved to be too dark & heavy just as Dune would meet the same fate. Later on through video releases and cable showings, these two films found new audiences that appreciated what earlier ones rejected: Their detailed visuals, aural fireworks, and deep plots that required repeated viewings which offer more rewards with every showing.
Tonight I watched 'The Final Cut' on my 32'' set and wished I saw it in the theater like the first time. The visuals are better than ever but cry out for the big screen. The letterbox format is the only way to savor this feast for the eyes and a good surround sound system lets the music and effects breathe more life into the story. What's missing from the orginal version? Harrison Ford's weary voiceover that was added because test audiences had trouble following the plot but I didn't miss it this time. Maybe it's because I seen the movie a few times and own a book about the making of the movie and also read many articles. I think today's viewers are more sophisticated in handling the narratives that aren't spoonfed. Also missing is the 'happy' ending that isn't really necessary but also felt needed by the studio. All this & more is explained in the three hours + documentary. If you really want to know how movies are made from beginning to end, this is where to start.
What 1982's Blade Runner attempted was to make a 1940's film noir detective story and place it forty years ahead in 2019. Some of the clothing and, most noticably, Sean Young's hairdo look like they escaped from a Bogart movie as they mingle with the urban/punk outfits of a decaying Los Angeles. The entire look of the city has been copied in many futuristic movies portraying a negative utopia. What's also amazing is thatthe visuals were painstakingly created before there were computer generated graphics. What also impressed me was Rutger Hauer's performance. He was also physically perfect for the role. I forgot how good he was here and it's too bad he never went on to more or better leading roles in better movies. The same goes for an inexperienced Sean Young....
Some films get better with age like a fine wine and this one is no exception. What was original way back then has been copied in almost every sci fi film and TV show. If you're a super fan, get the deluxe set that includes the original/voiceover version. Actually I think that version and this latest one both work on their own terms. My next viewing will be listening to director Ridley Scott's commentary. How many of you ever take the time to explore the bonus features of DVDs? You should because you're missing so much that will enhance your knowledge and pleasure of a good movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment